Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

code hygiene: rename validateEnabled to validateEnabledType #2469

Conversation

crodriguezvega
Copy link
Contributor

Description

closes: #2266


Before we can merge this PR, please make sure that all the following items have been
checked off. If any of the checklist items are not applicable, please leave them but
write a little note why.

  • Targeted PR against correct branch (see CONTRIBUTING.md)
  • Linked to Github issue with discussion and accepted design OR link to spec that describes this work.
  • Code follows the module structure standards.
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Updated relevant documentation (docs/) or specification (x/<module>/spec/)
  • Added relevant godoc comments.
  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Re-reviewed Files changed in the Github PR explorer
  • Review Codecov Report in the comment section below once CI passes

Copy link
Member

@damiannolan damiannolan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @crodriguezvega! LGTM

}
}

func validateEnabled(i interface{}) error {
func validateEnabledType(i interface{}) error {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

fwiw, we can remove these functions when we self manage params

…ccountscontrollertypes-paramsvalidate-suspiciously-performs-no-checks-yet-unnecessary-conversions-from-bool-to-interface-then-checks-if-value-is-a-bool-and-not-if-it-is-enabled
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Oct 5, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #2469 (813f40a) into main (4bd05c6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 36.36%.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2469   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   78.70%   78.70%           
=======================================
  Files         178      178           
  Lines       12311    12311           
=======================================
  Hits         9689     9689           
  Misses       2195     2195           
  Partials      427      427           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../27-interchain-accounts/controller/types/params.go 47.82% <33.33%> (ø)
...s/apps/27-interchain-accounts/host/types/params.go 42.10% <33.33%> (ø)
modules/apps/transfer/types/params.go 48.00% <40.00%> (ø)

Carlos Rodriguez added 2 commits October 5, 2022 22:23
…ccountscontrollertypes-paramsvalidate-suspiciously-performs-no-checks-yet-unnecessary-conversions-from-bool-to-interface-then-checks-if-value-is-a-bool-and-not-if-it-is-enabled
…ccountscontrollertypes-paramsvalidate-suspiciously-performs-no-checks-yet-unnecessary-conversions-from-bool-to-interface-then-checks-if-value-is-a-bool-and-not-if-it-is-enabled
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega merged commit 6a70103 into main Oct 6, 2022
@crodriguezvega crodriguezvega deleted the carlos/issue#2266-modulesapps27-interchain-accountscontrollertypes-paramsvalidate-suspiciously-performs-no-checks-yet-unnecessary-conversions-from-bool-to-interface-then-checks-if-value-is-a-bool-and-not-if-it-is-enabled branch October 6, 2022 12:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
4 participants